Sunday, May 10, 2009

IT IS GOOD TO BE BACK.
.
.
.
.
I repeat. . it is good to be back. I have indeed missed the opportunity to present the Wilbert Coffin case to you. There is an upside however, while I have been away I have received a number of messages and e-mails that sheds a bit of light on certain important aspects of the case, and I shall be presenting those to you in a timely correlated fashion.
.
I might also mention that someone was kind enough to copy me a message posted sometime back by Mr. Fortin on his site. The message indicated that I was dead. It is generally accepted as good jouurnalistic protocol that one would take a few minutes and check that sort of information out before publishing onto a public site. I note the message has since been removed, so I shall accept it as a mistake. Just before I leave, it has been further pointed out to me that you have my picture published on your site. That is ok because lets face it Mr. Fortin, your site does look sort of bland and plain. This gives it a youthful and vibrant look.
.
One last thing, and this is a message to both you Mr. Fortin, and "Anonymous Andre". From now the road will get a bit rocky pertaining to this case. You may want to look beyond the box containing the Brossard Report. We are going to hit the autopsy reports hard. We are going to hit them where they should have been hit fifty -five years ago in Perce. We are also going to strike back at the lack of ballistic information.
.
What I am saying is that there was much more than the Brossard report ever presented. Again I remind everyone that the Brossard report was not put together to prove or disprove the Wilbert Coffin trial. It was merely convened in a vain effort by the government of Quebec to make the judiciary look better. We all know this report was aimed at Jacques Hebert, and I stress the fact that this report was done almost a full decade after Mr. Coffin's trial in 1954. If Jacques Hebert could be made to look bad, then the judiciary would look better, without having to address the situation pertaining to suppressed evidence and witnesses.
.
Having had some time to look over this site of Mr. Fortin's in the past month, I am amazed that he would not have written some of this stuff while Mr. Jacques Hebert was still alive. There is an old adage that states, "If you are going to kick a man, then kick a dead one, as he cannot strike back." The same appears to follow true with reference to the writings referring to Lewis Sinnett, Mrs. Coffin,Henri Doyon etal.
.
I will be back with a new posting in a day or so. I want to get this going as quickly as possible, because it is here where strong argument can be made against the way in which these people died, and the shoddy way in which the evidence was presented at trial.
.
To each and everyone across Canada who took the time to send me a note, thank you once again for bearing with me during these troubled times. God Bless you one and all.
.
.
Lew Stoddard

2 comments:

B. McQueen said...

Hello Lew,

Good to see that you are back and from your first posting it looks like you come out of your corner fighting. Looking forward to seeing this autopsey reports in detail.

Hope your health has improved'

B. McQueen
Calgary

Roland Petrie said...

Great to see you back. I know first hand that the results of chemotherapy and radiation are not pleasant.

Never gave up on you site, would never do that, checked all the time, that was the the reason that I sent the e-mail. Looking forward to you getting rolling once again.

Regards,

Roland Petrie
Saint John